Some people love
the opening of baseball season and the ensuing conversation. Personally, I find
the discussion following the "Pew has a new poll" season even more
fascinating. The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life recently released
"'Nones' on the Rise" (http://www.pewforum.org/Unaffiliated/nones-on-the-rise.aspx),
so this month I feel quite like all those baseball fans who thrill at the first
pitch on opening day.
Each time they
publish their findings, a certain portion of the Christian world, especially
the mainline Protestant clan and some evangelicals now in decline, engage in
what amounts to hand-wringing. Their reaction is of the "Oh Lord, we are
no longer the majority, what are we going to do in our new minority
status?" variety. This group starts brainstorming how to once again reach
those who mostly aren't interested in being reached.
There is
another Christian subset that responds to these Pew updates with something
approaching glee. This group's voice is recently tempered, a bit less shrill, as even
this bastion of conservative Christian commitment sees flagging membership and
participation--but they are still out there. I can actually quote directly from
someone in this camp, since they tweeted back at me when I first posted the Pew
study: "Revisionist theology does not give birth to disciples of
Christ--but does give rise to those who see all religions as equally valid.
That we see this remarkable rise in the number of spiritual invalids should be
no surprise given what has been preached from American pulpits for
decades." It's all the fault of liberal Protestantism, see?
This group
isn't at all interested in reaching the "nones" unless they magically
find their way back to the conservative, rule-based and doctrinally-centered
core of true Christianity.
As a weird
hipster Lutheran, I have a completely other response. I am, to begin with,
happy with the increase in the number of people reporting their status as
"nones." I am happy that the nones feel free to be authentic about
their religious commitments (or lack thereof). The Pew report states,
"These trends suggest that the ranks of the unaffiliated are swelling in
surveys partly because Americans who rarely go to services are more
willing than in the past to drop their religious attachments altogether."
Praise God, I say. People in in North America are apparently now more free than
they ever have been to state who they actually are, without fear. Conformity to
the majority religiosity of our nation is less demanded, and I say that is all
to the good.
My second
reaction, equally strong, is... let's go on a road trip! If the nones are not
out there "looking for" religious community (88% report they aren't
even looking), then those of us who are part of religious communities, and
sense a continuing call to proclaim the gospel, now have a place to go and a
people to reach. Billboards and mailers aren't going to cut it. We have the
tremendous opportunity to go where the "nones" are, where they hang
out. Since they aren't seekers, and don't plan to be, the onus is on us. We get
to seek.
Which leads to
my third reaction... real life is messy. I'm thrilled by this opportunity, if
also scared and nervous. Trying to live faith where people are, rather than
draw people to the place we think we can safely practice faith, is no small
thing. I was trained to live Christian faith in community that already has a
certain shape. To get out into the world of the unaffiliated and figure out how
to bear Christ there, well, that's both awesome opportunity and tremendous
challenge. But I'm game.
Finally, it's
probably worth reminding ourselves that even though Protestants now make up
"only" 48% of the populations, that's still a whopping 48%. The
nones, though a growing group, still feel like a minority, and a beleaguered
minority at that. Just spend time talking to those who are religiously unaffiliated,
and you will learn they are overwhelmed at times by our zeal, our stumbling
attempts at evangelism and outreach. Many are nones for a reason. At the very
least, the call of the religious community in response to news from Pew, is to
be a non-anxious presence. Instead of upping our anxiety at our diminishing
numbers, perhaps we are called, even more than heretofore, to empathize with
those religious (and non-religious) groups who are truly minorities.
The Pew study
was released on-line, which is often a recipe for failing to read the
footnotes. All the footnotes in this study are worth attention, in fact in some
cases are even more interesting than the summary findings themselves. I found
footnote 11 especially illuminating, "Studies have found that some survey
respondents switch back and forth between describing themselves as affiliated
and unaffiliated. Researchers call such people 'liminals' because they seem to
straddle the threshold of a religious tradition, partly in and partly out. In a
2006 survey and follow-up interviews in 2007, Robert Putnam and David Campbell
found that roughly 10% of the members of each major religious tradition can be
considered liminals. Moreover, they found that although the liminals’ nominal
affiliation changed (in either direction) from one year to the next, their
self-reported religious beliefs and practices remained largely the same. This
may be seen as further evidence that the rise in the number of unaffiliated
Americans is not just a reflection." Such description should increase our
sensitivity within our own traditions to the sense of liminality many of our
own members feel within our tradition.
And then there is
footnote 12, which offers a glimmer of hope for the hand-wringers.
"Nevertheless, there is substantial switching from unaffiliated to
affiliated. In the current survey, four-in-ten adults who say they were raised
unaffiliated now identify themselves as religiously affiliated."
Clint Schnekloth
Pastor
Good Shepherd
Lutheran Church, Fayetteville, Arkansas