Friday, January 22, 2016

Finnish Lutherans and Pope Francis For the Full Communion Win

Some thoughts on the major implications of Finnish Lutherans receiving communion at the Vatican last week.
1) This simply proves what we all already know, that Finns are awesome, as is Henry of Uppsala.

2) The fact that it was communion for an ecumenical delegation working on full communion between the Orthodox, Catholics and Lutherans makes it even more momentous.

3) Lutherans of our "type," by which I mean Lutherans who subscribe to the confessions of the church but understand them as being open to ecumenical engagement and a move towards full communion with the pieces of a divided church, will celebrate this move, and probably initiate many local conversations inspired by the practice.

4) This will also give implicit permission to a regular practice I have experienced all over Roman Catholicism--openness to widening who can receive the meal at Christ's table.

5) What a lot of people don't know is that Roman Catholics and Lutherans are already in fundamental agreement about the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. Lutherans, unlike some other Protestants, do not believe in a symbolic presence. We believe Christ is truly present in, with, and under the bread and the wine.

6) Theologians, based on a faulty interpretation of 1 Corinthians, have sometimes taught that you have to believe the right things in order to receive communion. Churches that believe this practice "closed" communion available only to those who adhere to the correct doctrinal beliefs. Catholics do not believe this, exactly. Instead, more important to Catholics is that people not be living in sin, that they be in a "state of grace" when communing. In other words, true repentance is a prerequisite of reception.

7) More contemporary readings of 1 Corinthians 11 argue that when Paul says we eat and drink condemnation to ourselves when we do not discern the body in the meal, he wasn't speaking of right doctrinal belief, but rather injustices based on economic and other kinds of divisions in the church in Corinth. 

8) In other words, it may be the case that the condemnation so many fear is most likely to happen by closing the table to others for the wrong reasons, and not recognizing the unity all Christians share in Christ, through baptism, in the Spirit.

9) All of which is to say it is baptism that centers the Eucharist and access to it, not doctrine, not sin, not sentiment. It is the Spirit that draws us into this unity. The pope is acting "in Christ" when he opens the table, because he is extending the table the way Christ extended it.

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Why is Christian art so bad?

Columbus's voyage was a hinge in time. It swung open a door barely ajar, and for the next hundred years after 1493, no significant cathedral, unless previously planned, was begun. The effect of America's discovery on the European imagination was as though God had been hiding a piece of land bigger than the known world since the dawn of creation. The great lesson of this turnaround is that when any relationship system is imaginatively gridlocked, it cannot get free simply through more thinking about the problem. Conceptually stuck systems cannot become unstuck simply by trying harder. For a fundamental reorientation to occur, that spirit of adventure which optimizes serendipity and which enables new perceptions beyond the control of our thinking processes must happen first. (Edwin Friedman)
“Wait? I didn’t know you were like a good artist. When you told me you were a Christian,
I thought you just painted pictures of Jesus holding sheep and stuff.
Why is Christian art so kitsch? Whether it's music, or film, or literature, much of what counts for Christian creativity is derivative, saccharine, or propagandist. Much of it is just plain awful.

This hasn't always been the case, and certainly, there are creative Christian artists today, but by and large, ever since Christian became a genre rather than an inspiration, we have witnessed a decline in true creativity from a Christian perspective, so much so that we might say it is the secular that now lays claim to true creativity.

It is the role of faith to be art.

Anyone attending to Christianity and creativity has known for quite some time that Christianity has lost its creative edge. Walk through any art museum and you can witness the turn. True artists remain committed to the beautiful, but increasingly this becomes disconnected from the faith.

Now, I am not lamenting the creation of great secular art. The majority of art today that truly inspires me arises from the secular milieu, and I'm just fine with that. Nor am I saying that the secular doesn't also produce loads and loads of kitsch. Of course it does. 

What I am saying is that the secular produces particularly fine art, genius art, at rates that far exceed anything coming out of what used to be the dominant religious tradition of the West, and this puzzles and to a certain degree concerns me. I am especially curious why my own tradition, my own denomination, so infrequently inspires and funds great artistic creation.

Terraforming Mars

Certain things happen in the world that so jar the imagination that nothing remains the same. Edwin Friedman claims that one such event in Western civilization was Columbus's voyage. Cathedrals, the premier artistic creation of the medieval era, waned. Instead, creativity was directed elsewhere. 

I think the same could be said for Christian art more generally, but the cause of that shift was not a new discovery, but rather the rise of modernity. Charles Taylor in A Secular Age argues that the emergence of the secular is not actually a decline in religiosity, but rather the multiplication of options, so that the conditions for the existence either of religious or secular worldviews have shifted, and both secular and religious options are available.

I think Christian art has declined ever since. Although there was an initial flowering of Christian art after Columbus's voyage (Michelangelo, Da Vinci, Shakespeare, Cervantes, Rabelais, El Greco, to name a few), the High Renaissance was the beginning of the end in some ways for what we might call distinctively Christian art.

The Expanse
I think today of the art that is truly inspiring. I think of the levels of meaning, the grandeur of creation, that so captivate us. A couple of examples. Jessica Jones, which is simply one installment in the Marvel comic universe, explores the human experience of PTSD and rape culture so that viewers have increased empathy and love for suffering humanity. The Expanse, about the human settlement of this solar system, puts on the screen the real science of space exploration. It is nothing short of operatic in its scope and execution. Or the multi-valence and profundity of Fargo

And all of that is just television. The mostly secular creatives engaged in developing these shows are reflecting back to us what it means to be human, what counts as the beautiful, in ways Christian communities aren't. It's no wonder, then, that increasing numbers of people find Christian faith and church community superfluous. If you can plum the depths of human beauty more frequently outside of the faith than in it, why bother?

Yet when I watch these shows, I often think to myself, I wish Christian theology could influence them a bit more, because they'd be all the richer for it. Last season's Daredevil, another Marvel creation on Netflix, the protagonist is a Catholic, and his agonized conversations with his priest are so very poignant, and might be even more rich if a creative theologian had the opportunity to connect actual penitential practice to the scenes. 

Or the best movie of last year, Spotlight, which depicted the power and influence of investigative journalism, not to mention the importance of self-differentiated leadership in the face of sabotage, knew the human side of reporting very, very well, not to mention the human culture of cover-up, and the urban life of Boston. 

But imagine if the church could make a movie like that about itself, from the inside. In the secular era, with a multiplicity of approaches to religiosity and secularity, we as much need a secular look at the church as we do a religious look at secular reporting. 

Right before Christmas, those of us who follow advances in space science watched footage of Elon Musk landing a rocket. One friend wrote at that time:
I am so excited. Yesterday we made a tremendous advance in space flight and it went mostly unnoticed. We now have a proof-of-concept for technology that could reduce the cost of space flight to 10% or even less of what it costs today. 
This is a critical step to becoming a multi-planetary species. I am anxiously awaiting the details of Elon Musk's Mars Colonial Transporter, the plans for which are due any day. In about a decade, we will be sending manned missions to Mars. A new epoch is upon us.
I am guessing whenever we do start sending missions to Mars, there will be another shift in our cultural imagination comparable to the shift that occurred after Columbus. In the meantime, I wonder what kind of shift might shock us out of our complacency in the present moment, or if anything can.

Patronizing the Fellowship

There are hints here and there of immense creativity from Christians. Of course, there's the continuing influence of C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien, whose creative works still can teach us much about Christian creativity that isn't "about" Christianity but rather embodies it. We need more of this.


Today, when I think of Christian creativity I'd like to emulate, top of the list is the Myst video game, which was created by two Christian designers, but is really a beautiful open-world immersive puzzler. Or, although not Christian, certainly more theologically rich than almost any other artistic creation of the 21st century, Bioshock.

If we are going to have more of this, we need publishing houses and patrons who "get" that creative Christianity is not creative because it is "about" the church, or faith, or Christianity, but because it embodies it. Most everything else tends towards dogmatic portrayals of what the artist thinks Christianity should be, and any propaganda of this sort is always only beautiful by accident (just think of art from the Soviet era, for example). 

I think we need more leaders in the Christian arts who get that creatives need a community, and they need patronage. One of my favorite thought-leaders on this is Amanda Palmer. No, she's not a Christian. I think she is solidly in the secular camp. But her process and forms of creativity can inspire us, I believe, and she is totally the leader on crowd-sourcing and funding. She recently helped launch Patreon, which is a web-based platform for funding creatives.

I am not yet sure what our Columbus will be, or if there will be one. I'd like to imagine it will be this simple news, that table-top board games raised more money on Kickstarter last year than video games. Maybe progressive Christians will leap into game design. I don't know. 

Or maybe it will be the real freedom Christians now have precisely because they are no longer the majority in most of the Western world. Perhaps the shift that needs to happen is to stop thinking of Christian faith as that which colonizes the arts, but rather joins and enhances it.

No matter how we look at this, the point remains. Christians want to help one another and the world be more deeply and creatively human. We have a lot to learn from creative seculars about how to have Christian faith do this, rather than its opposite.


"The Church needs to get back into the work of the Beautiful. It needs to get back into the work of subsidizing and training and mentoring artists and guilds.  It needs to feed people who can sing and write music, and commission their works.  In a previous day, we would have commissioned statues and paintings. Today’s Church should commission novels and movies and screenplays."

Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/blog/jennifer-fulwiler/what-would-it-take-for-christianity-to-dominate-the-arts/#ixzz3xhqDn3PS

Monday, January 18, 2016

Three Quotes and a Speech | Martin Luther King Jr. Breaking the Silence

"Whites, it must frankly be said, are not putting in a similar mass effort to reeducate themselves out of their racial ignorance. It is an aspect of their sense of superiority that the white people of America believe they have so little to learn. The reality of substantial investment to assist Negroes into the twentieth century, adjusting to Negro neighbors and genuine school integration, is still a nightmare for all too many white Americans. White America would have liked to believe that in the past ten years a mechanism had somehow been created that needed only orderly and smooth tending for the painless accomplishment of change. Yet this is precisely what has not been achieved. [….] These are the deepest causes for contemporary abrasions between the races. Loose and easy language about equality, resonant resolutions about brotherhood fall pleasantly on the ear, but for the Negro there is a credibility gap he cannot overlook. He remembers that with each modest advance the white population promptly raises the argument that the Negro has come far enough. Each step forward accents an ever-present tendency to backlash."

"Why is equality to assiduously avoided? Why does white America delude itself , and how does it rationalize the evil it retains? The majority of white Americans consider themselves sincerely committed to justice for the Negro. They believe that American society is essentially hospitable to fair play and to steady growth toward a middle-class Utopia embodying racial harmony. But unfortunately this is a fantasy of self-deception and comfortable vanity."

“The thing wrong with America is white racism. White folks are not right…It’s time for America to have an intensified study on what’s wrong with white folks.”


Anti-Refugee Vote This Week--Urge Your Senators to Vote No

Stand for Welcome logo
Holiday Hope Syrian Boy
   
 TAKE ACTION! 
   
   
URGE YOUR SENATORS

Urge your Senators to vote NO on the "American SAFE Act". Share this letter from hundreds of faith leaders. http://ow.ly/X7rmb
     
Share this: Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
     
SHARE OUR SAMPLE TWEET

Call and urge your Senators to oppose the ''American SAFE Act'': 1-866-961-4293. Stand for renewed hope not renewed hate. #StandForWelcome
   
Share this: Share on Twitter
   
   
 GIVE TODAY! 
   
   
ANTI-REFUGEE VOTE NEXT WEEK - URGE YOUR SENATORS TO VOTE NO

Dear Clint,

We hope you are well-rested from your Christmas and New Year celebrations because we need your help! Urge your Senators to vote with compassion next week on a bill that would cripple the United States' refugee program’s ability to protect the most vulnerable.

On Wednesday, January 20th, the United States Senate votes to decide if the “American Security Against Foreign Enemies (SAFE) Act of 2015” (H.R. 4038)—that already passed through the House of Representatives—will advance in the Senate. The vote is expected to be extremely close. If this bill were signed into law, it would become nearly impossible to welcome certain refugees. Further, the bill subjects Syrian and Iraqi refugees to differential treatment and intense scrutiny as a means of preventing their resettlement in the United States.

This reactionary bill passed the House of Representatives just days after the tragic attacks in Paris, displaying a lack of understanding of the robust and secure vetting process before a refugee is admitted to the United States. In fact, many Representatives who initially voted for the bill signaled regret later.

LIRS believes, based on over 75 years of experience resettling refugees, that our resettlement system must not be foreclosed to the most vulnerable, including Syrians and Iraqis who themselves are fleeing the terror of ISIS. As The Rev. Roger R. Gustafson, bishop of the Central States Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, reminds us, “[b]y refusing to allow those fleeing for their lives to find shelter on safer shores, we would be making them double victims: victims of the persecution [from which they are fleeing] and victims because they are now being villainized for atrocities in which they had no part.” This bill will tell the world that the American people have no interest in protecting victims of violence in Syria and Iraq.

To prevent this detrimental piece of legislation from blocking relief from tens of thousands of refugees, your Senator needs to hear from you today and every day until the vote occurs. Urge your Senators today to protect refugees! Here are a few ways to do so:
  • Call your Senators using the Congressional switchboard: 1-866-961-4293 and urge them to vote NO on the American SAFE Act on Wednesday. 
  • Send a written message here urging your Senators to oppose any Congressional action that would limit vulnerable refugees’ access to protection.
  • Share with your Senators this letter from faith leaders nationwide opposing the bill and ask your family and friends to do the same.
Make certain that in 2016 America stands for renewed hope not renewed hate. As people of faith, we are committed to protecting the world’s most vulnerable and to seeing the face of God in our neighbor. Thank you for your compassion, and as always, thank you for standing for welcome.

In Peace,

Brittney Nystrom
Director for Advocacy